Saturday, May 30, 2009

Falling Rocks, Becoming Rock: roll away the stone!



For quite a while I had been looking for a DVD of the 1957 movie by director Jack Arnold (who also did The Creature From the Black Lagoon) called Monolith Monsters. It is apparently not available but I happened to do a search for it yesterday on YouTube and there it was in all its black and white fifties glory.

(It will sometimes give you an option to watch all 8 segments automatically)

The storyline: A small western community is beset by a strange phenomena. Apparent a meteor has fallen and is composed of a strange rock-like material but the fragmented pieces of which have the startling ability to grow a hundred feet tall when water hits it, and then to topple whereupon the tip begins the cycle all over again, rising and falling, crushing whatever is in the path of this roving forest of falling rocks. And of course the town people take various actions to ‘cut them off at the pass’ as the deluge proceeds down from the high desert.

Oh, and I forgot one thing: if a person touches one of the weird rocks, they themselves start to slowly turn to rock.

I suppose if I had not posted the article on otoliths ('rocks' inside the head/ear which establish direction, stability, and hence ‘way-finding’ if I can put it that way) and its opening on the holy ka’ba, the Islamic black rock which some claim to be a meteorite, I would not have been so struck by (re)finding Monolith Monsters, about rocks which seem to have a, albeit crude, life of their own and can cause a reification (becoming thing-like) in living creatures.

I use the term reification purposely. It is often used in socio-political studies to indicate an effect that various state apparatuses can have on the individual, making them purposeless, with little affect or direction other than what the apparatus gives them – rock-like in other words!

And of course we HOPE that artistic/creative activity can have an apotropaic quality [From Greek apotropaios, from apotrepein, to ward off : apo-, apo- + trepein, to turn.]
'referring to an image or device which is designed to ward off unwanted influences' --- and often times by being a part of the evil, or by seducing it, in order to get it closer and deal with it (e.g., homeopathic medicine). Although in this case I think of those Japanese beetle traps which contain a hormone, intending to entice the bugs but ALSO sending out a general signal which can flood the area with unintended consequences. (within the context of the film, the apotropaic magical substance that undoes the rock monsters is…salt, which of course is a crystalline thing itself and if it had to be used widely , that is, outside the saintly mystical precincts of the desert where such monstration often and appropriate takes place, would wind up killing all life!

The line between living/dead, creative/destructive, the sacred/profane wavers tremendously. As far as I can tell, the apparatus seeks to confine that oscillation while creative activity often seeks to live in that oscillation and even to expand it. Of course that used to be the idea of the 'avant-garde' (living in that oscillatory boundary) and all the other arts (which seek comfortable perception and hence form part of the walls and devices that make the apparatus work; this is called ordinary life and can be a good thing...think life in war time -- er, the old sort of war time -- when nothing works).

Now that doesn't seem to be the case, since the central core of capitalism seems to be a sort of experimentalist impulse which it has found out can be a way of expanding markets and inventing new resources (the cyberworld) which it can exploit. We see now that the advance guard in the arts was aptly named. The image and the apparatus have found a way to mutually reinforce themselves, and most times with little regard for the 'human' element but rather most importance placed on the structural supports (not that it’s that easy to tell them apart—but that’s another story…sorta.) In a way, which I won't expand, everyday life now IS a sort of wartime, at least in the speeds, tensions, collisions, accidents, disruptions that now seem continuous.

But the becoming-alive of the obdurate, admantine stuff which surrounds us is an old story (along with the becoming-rock of the human, most famous being the tale of the medusa; but that’s another story too… sorta) as is really the blurred line dividing the two (e.g. Ovid's Metamorphosis). Perhaps what is different now (arguable. Some would say nothing is different now) is the tech we have to facilitate those transitions…what happens when artists are able to make chimera with table top equipment? (which reminds me of a new movie which I haven't seen yet – Splinters - but which seems to have some elements in common with the Monolith Monsters with the same difference as other fifties sci fi / horror films from then: then the horror was always from the outside trying to get in; now its from the inside trying to get out; think Invasion of the Body Snatchers and its remakes.)

Perhaps that is where the apparatus and the image truly fuse … but I wouldn't start jumping for joy just yet …wait until you REALLY hear rocks falling.

1 comment:

troylloyd said...

falling rocks indeed.
a great post Robert.
the reading of which produced sparks like when gravel is thrown upon railroad tracks.

i was reminded of when i was a young kid, being amazed by my uncles rock tumblings. how such a rough matte rock could be tumbled into a highly polished unrocklike thing. the raw material of the thing is the same, only the aesthetics are changed.

& to go contra-islamic, i thought of the Jewish concept of Golem, altho made from clay, still representative of a "crisis monster" & how technology can go asunder.

i found a famous film i've never seen:
The Golem: How He Came Into the World

& then an interesting bit about a story by Stanislav Lem:
The Lectures of Golem XIV

& a bit about an interesting parable:

In one particularly chilling variation, the creator-creation dynamic was utterly shattered when a Golem crafted by the prophet Jeremiah with the inscription “The Lord God is truth,” erased the essential aleph himself, changing the words to “The Lord God is dead.” According to Sherwin, “the message of the parable is that once human beings become creators they are in danger of forgetting the Creator. Once the creature becomes a creator overwhelmed by his own achievements he may act as if God is dead and he is now God”

& a warning:

“At a time when Golems populate our daily lives, at a time when we must relate tomachines on a daily basis, the challenge before us is not how to build bigger and better Golems, buthow to prevent ourselves from becoming Golems and from having our lives controlled or evenharmed by the Golems we have created”

& then, Foucault:

"Science is the increasing ordering of all realms under the guise of improving the welfare of the individual and the population ... a strategy with no one directing it and everyone increasingly enmeshed in it, whose only end is the increase of order and power itself."

& then into snakish lair of swirling serpents:

The ontological uncertainty in which the subject hovers between being and not being is exactly what Medusa represents. Arousing terror and fascination she leads the observer to and often beyond the frontier of petrifaction. Cruelties, war, death, Artaud's plague, are horrifying and gruesome, but in this horror and extreme ugliness a kind of purity and beauty shines through. This can best be illustrated by the ambivalent quality of Medusa's blood: one sample of it is poisonous, while the other is said to have a healing, purifying effect, as we may read in Euripides. (Euripedes: vs. 736-1003-1005) A society that succeeds, says Bataille, in catching the ambiguity of the cruel which consists of "tremendum" and "fascinans", has attained the ideal model. Such a society he calls "acéphale", or headless. Like in the mythology of Baubo, the head shifts to the belly. The snakes sliding over Medusa's skull should also be considered in this light. No doubt twisting snakes are right up Freud's alley, but his interpretation of snakes as a substitute for the penis only makes sense with regard to Medusa's ambiguous nature. The castration fear is alleviated; fright acquires a fascinating touch.
To See or not to See. The ambiguity of Medusa& finally, the silence of stone:
the expression of pain

more marble than men:
Laocoön


Equo ne credite. . .